The 8values test
8values is one of the best-known political quizzes built around several separate values. This independent guide explains its mechanics before you compare it with a twelve-axis profile.
The two quizzes share a statement-and-agreement format, but they do not measure the same dimensions. Here is a direct comparison without pretending one is universally better.
Short answer: 8values uses 70 statements and eight values on four axes. 12Axes uses 36, 60 or 120 statements and twelve independent axes. 8values reports percentages plus a closest-match ideology; 12Axes reports twelve scores from −100 to +100 and compares the full vector with a published library.
8values is built for a compact map. Four axes are easy to display, compare and remember, and the eight percentages give a recognisable shape without asking the reader to interpret a dozen separate panels. Its closest-match feature adds an ideological label on top of that map.
12Axes is built to keep more distinctions visible. Economic ownership, welfare provision, state power, democratic participation, national sovereignty, military posture, cultural change, religion, ecology, technology, constitutional structure and rights each get their own reading. The cost is more statements and a denser result; the benefit is that a strong position on one axis does not silently determine another.
The models share subject matter, so rough correspondences are tempting. 8values' economic axis overlaps with 12Axes' economy and welfare axes; its diplomatic axis touches sovereignty and force; its civil axis touches power, democracy and rights; its societal axis spans culture, religion, ecology and technology. These are comparisons of theme, not officially matched scales.
Do not convert an 8values percentage into a 12Axes score by stretching it across several axes. The questions were not written for that translation, and the two scoring systems do not share a calibration point.
8values presents eight percentages and then attempts a closest ideological match. Its own documentation warns that the match is less reliable than the value scores. 12Axes presents twelve signed scores and ranks the whole vector against ideologies, civic traditions and historical figures. The 12Axes result also lets you inspect the axis definitions and the matching method.
A ranked list is not automatically more accurate than a single label. It is more transparent: you can see which axes drove a match, where two profiles diverge, and whether the written description fits your reasoning. That transparency is the useful difference, not a claim of superior prediction.
Take 8values first if you want a familiar, compact eight-value snapshot and a quick ideological prompt. Take 12Axes first if you want to separate economic, social, constitutional and technological questions, or if an eight-value result has left you with an obvious unresolved tension.
Taking both is reasonable if you compare them as different instruments. Look for agreement in broad direction, then investigate the places where the models diverge. A disagreement may reflect a genuinely mixed position, a difference in question wording, or an axis that one model compresses.
The explanation above is easier to judge against your own answers than against an abstract example. Choose a run length and see which political values move for you.
No. They have separate question banks and separate axis definitions. Any wording that looks similar should be treated as a thematic overlap, not a shared item.
Not directly. 8values reports percentages of a maximum; 12Axes reports signed positions from −100 to +100 on twelve dimensions. The scales and dimensions are not calibrated to each other.
There is no credible basis for that claim. The tests ask different questions and produce different kinds of output. 12Axes offers more dimensions and published method pages; that is a difference in scope, not proof of accuracy.
The original 8values test has 70 statements. 12Axes offers 36, 60 and 120-statement runs, so its shortest version is shorter and its longest is longer.
A repeat can be useful if your first answers were rushed or ambiguous. Use the same run length for a cleaner comparison, and read the axis definitions before deciding that a changed score is meaningful.
8values is one of the best-known political quizzes built around several separate values. This independent guide explains its mechanics before you compare it with a twelve-axis profile.
9Axes and 12Axes both reject a single left-right line, but they divide politics differently. This comparison focuses on documented mechanics and the practical choice between them.
The 12Axes test turns political statements into twelve separate readings rather than one left-versus-right score. This guide explains what happens before, during, and after a run.
A 12Axes result contains twelve positions, ranked comparisons and a shareable link. This guide explains how to read those pieces without treating the profile as a scientific verdict.
Or return to the 12Axes homepage for the product overview, report pricing and main FAQ.
The test is free, needs no account, and scores your answers in this browser. Start with the recommended run, or take the longest one when two ideologies sit close together.