12Axes · Deep report preview
Georgism: the evidence behind your profile
A worked example of the full 120-statement report: every answer is connected to its axis score, followed by cross-axis readings and a one-answer sensitivity check.
Sample only · Responses are generated for demonstration and are not a real person's answers.
01 · Overview
What shaped this profile
The profile is strongest on Rights at +65 toward Entrenched rights. Across the full run, the sample includes 42 agreement responses, 50 disagreement responses and 28 neutral answers. Each axis is scored from statements asked in both directions, so agreement by itself does not determine a result.
02 · Answer evidence
How each answer moved an axis
Open an axis to inspect its ten statements. “Contribution” shows the score points each response adds toward that axis's left or right pole; the total matches the displayed axis score. This is an explanatory breakdown of the published scoring, not a claim about why you hold a view.
01Power10 statements · Civil liberty-35
A government that cannot monitor its citizens cannot protect them.
Emergency powers granted during a crisis are rarely given back afterwards.
National security sometimes has to come before an individual's privacy.
Protesting an unjust law is legitimate even when the protest is disruptive.
The state should be able to shut down organisations that openly seek to overthrow the constitutional order.
A free press must be allowed to publish material that embarrasses the government.
Identity checks and travel records are a reasonable price for public safety.
The burden of proof should always rest on the state, never on the individual.
Order breaks down once citizens believe the law will not be enforced.
Police should need a warrant before reading anyone's private messages.
02Democracy10 statements · Popular rule-25
Major decisions should be taken by people with relevant training rather than by popular vote.
Referendums are a healthy check on elected politicians.
Voters reward short-term promises, so some budgets should be shielded from politics.
A parliament that ignores public opinion loses its legitimacy.
Central banks and constitutional courts work better when insulated from electoral pressure.
Ordinary citizens can be trusted with complex political questions.
Scientific advice should carry more weight in lawmaking than campaign slogans.
Recall votes and citizen initiatives should be available at national level.
Representatives usually understand the trade-offs better than the people who elect them.
Political authority comes from the consent of the governed, not from expertise.
03Economy10 statements · Free market+40
Prices set by supply and demand allocate resources better than any committee can.
Essential industries such as energy and water should be publicly owned.
Lower taxes and lighter regulation are the fastest route to prosperity.
Governments should direct investment towards the industries a country needs.
Competition between firms serves consumers better than state ownership does.
Some services are too important to be run for profit.
High minimum wages and powerful unions price young workers out of jobs.
The state has a duty to break up monopolies and limit concentrations of private wealth.
A country grows by letting failing businesses fail.
Strategic planning is more reliable than market luck when a crisis hits.
04Welfare10 statements · Social provision-20
Welfare should be a safety net of last resort, not a way of life.
Healthcare should be available to everyone regardless of ability to pay.
Lower taxes leave families better able to look after themselves.
A wealthy society should guarantee a minimum income to every citizen.
Long-term dependence on benefits damages communities more than it helps them.
Public housing and free childcare are investments, not expenses.
Charity and family networks help people more than state programmes do.
Poverty is a structural failure, so relieving it is a public responsibility.
Benefits should be conditional on work, training or community service.
Extreme inequality undermines the social stability that markets depend on.
05Sovereignty10 statements · National sovereignty+10
Countries should control their own borders, laws and currency.
International institutions should be able to bind member states on shared problems.
Trade agreements that override national courts go too far.
Migration enriches receiving countries and should be broadly welcomed.
A country's deepest ties are to its own people, not to a bloc.
Climate change and pandemics cannot be solved by countries acting alone.
A state that surrenders sovereignty gains nothing lasting in return.
Regional unions have made war between their members unthinkable.
Domestic law should take precedence over international treaties.
Global rules on tax and trade are the only way to discipline multinational companies.
06Force10 statements · Diplomacy-25
Military strength is the most reliable guarantee of peace.
Sanctions and patient negotiation resolve more conflicts than soldiers do.
Defence budgets should rise when rivals are rearming.
Armies are a poor instrument for building a stable international order.
Alliances are worth little unless members are willing to fight.
Peacekeeping missions and development aid prevent more wars than deterrence does.
Waiting for diplomacy while an aggressor gains ground is a costly mistake.
Compulsory military service is an unjustified limit on personal freedom.
Nuclear deterrence has kept the great powers from open war.
Military ceremony teaches the wrong lessons to a democracy.
07Culture10 statements · Progress-5
Old institutions survive because they encode lessons we would otherwise have to relearn.
A society that stops questioning its traditions stops improving.
Family, faith and local custom are the foundation of a decent society.
Art and literature should challenge the values of their audience.
Rapid social change leaves more people behind than it lifts.
Restrictions on language and lifestyle have no place in a modern country.
Patriotism and a shared national story hold a country together.
History classes should teach the uncomfortable parts of a national past.
Public ceremonies and monuments should present the nation at its best.
Inherited hierarchies deserve to be challenged rather than preserved.
08Religion10 statements · Secular state-40
Law should reflect the moral traditions a country was built on.
The state should remain strictly neutral between religions and non-believers.
Religious institutions care for the poor more effectively than state agencies do.
Faith belongs in private life, not in public policy.
Schools should be free to teach the religious tradition of their community.
Public money should not fund religious schools, symbols or ceremonies.
A society without shared moral foundations drifts into cynicism.
Elected officials should not invoke divine authority to justify laws.
Church and state work best when they support each other.
Religious law must never override civil rights in a modern state.
09Ecology10 statements · Ecological limits-55
Economic growth should not be sacrificed to distant environmental targets.
Climate change is the defining constraint on this century's politics.
Environmental rules should be judged by their cost to ordinary households.
Governments should tax and ration activities that damage the climate.
Technology and wealth, not restraint, will solve environmental problems.
Protecting ecosystems matters even when it slows the economy.
Energy security is more important than emissions targets.
Consumers must accept higher prices to decarbonise the economy.
Green regulation often exports pollution rather than reducing it.
Species and wilderness have value beyond their use to humans.
10Technology10 statements · Acceleration+25
Slowing down useful technology costs more lives than deploying it quickly.
New technologies should be proven safe before they are widely released.
Artificial intelligence and biotechnology will solve problems that politics cannot.
Automation is being deployed faster than societies can adapt.
Regulating emerging technology usually helps incumbents and hurts newcomers.
Governments should be able to pause a technology they cannot control.
Space exploration and frontier research justify their cost.
Platforms that reshape public debate should be accountable for the results.
People should be free to enhance their own bodies and minds.
Facial recognition and predictive policing go a step too far.
11Structure10 statements · Decentralisation-30
A strong central government is needed to make a country equal.
Local councils and regions should decide most of what affects daily life.
Shared national standards are better than a patchwork of local rules.
Capital cities should not decide what happens in distant provinces.
National crises expose the weakness of fragmented authority.
Cities and regions should be allowed to run their own tax and welfare systems.
Infrastructure and health systems work better when run nationally.
Communities understand their own problems better than ministries do.
A country divided into regions can be played off by its rivals.
Decentralised decision-making is the best available defence against tyranny.
12Rights10 statements · Entrenched rights+65
Courts should be able to strike down laws that the majority clearly approved.
Judges who overrule elected legislatures undermine public trust.
Some rights are so fundamental that no majority can vote them away.
In a democracy, the will of the many should outweigh the objections of the few.
A written bill of rights is the best protection for unpopular minorities.
Public opinion, not judicial review, is the proper judge of a law.
Constitutional limits on power matter more than winning an election.
A determined majority should be able to change any law it dislikes.
Entrenched rights are worth the friction they create.
Referendums should be able to overturn court rulings.
03 · Cross-axis reading
Where separate views meet
These pairings bring together scores the test measures separately. They are prompts for reflection, not diagnoses or proof that one answer caused another.
Market freedom alongside ecological limits
These answers favour price-led economic decisions while also placing clear limits on growth where environmental costs become too high. That is a combination of positions, not a contradiction the test can resolve for you.
Limits on state power, with rights protected from majorities
The profile leans toward civil liberty and entrenched rights. Together, those answers describe both a limit on day-to-day state authority and a safeguard against a temporary majority removing protected liberties.
Popular input and local decision-making
The pattern gives some weight to popular rule and decentralisation. It suggests checking whether your preference for participation is strongest at the national level, the local level, or both.
04 · What-if check
What changes if one answer is neutral?
This is a sensitivity check, not a prediction. It changes one response in the sample and reruns the same scoring and matching functions.
Courts should be able to strike down laws that the majority clearly approved.
Sample answer: Strongly agree. If changed to Neutral, this removes +10 points from Rights.
05 · Reading plan
Where to take the result next
Use the axis definitions to challenge the interpretation before treating any label as meaningful. The links below open the underlying definitions used by the test.
- 01Rights · +65
Start with the position you held most consistently.
- 02Economy · +40
Read this beside Ecology to explore a meaningful policy trade-off.
- 03Democracy · -25
Use this axis to examine who should decide when values pull in different directions.
12Axes · Illustrative sample · Scores and rankings are generated by the current test logic.