Toward Secular state
- Radical Republicanism -100
- Emma Goldman -78
- Jeremy Bentham -78
- Thomas Paine -78
How much room should faith have in public life? Whether public morality needs a sacred anchor.
The 112 written profiles are each stored with one value for this axis, written by hand. These are the ones furthest toward either end, and the ones closest to the middle.
A reading within ±12 is recorded as centred on this axis — the library prints no direction for it, because the stored value does not carry one.
These are editorial readings of the positions, not measurements of any party, movement or voter, and every vector is open to disagreement. Every profile, all three sets →
The question bank holds 10 statements for religion: 5 coded so that agreement counts toward Religious foundation, and 5 coded the other way, toward Secular state. The Short version draws 3 of them, Standard 5 and Deep 10.
Each statement is answered on a five-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. On this axis, 5 statements count agreement toward Religious foundation and 5 count it toward Secular state, so a run where you agree with everything does not drift to one end.
The two directions are averaged separately and then weighted equally, and the result is reported between −100 and +100: negative toward Secular state, positive toward Religious foundation. A statement you skip is not counted on this axis at all, so skipping never moves the score. Anything inside ±12 is recorded as centred rather than as a lean.
The same twelve values are what your result is matched against. How scoring works, in full →
Your result prints one value per axis, so you can agree with this page or argue with it.
This page covers one of twelve. The others: Power, Democracy, Economy, Welfare, Sovereignty, Force, Culture, Ecology, Technology, Structure, Rights.